Hebrews 9
- The Old Covenant and the New
Covenant Compared
A. Features of the Old Covenant described.
1. (1-5) The Old
Covenant's tabernacle and its furnishings.
a. The earthly sanctuary: The tabernacle ordained by the Old Covenant
was planned by God, but planned for an earthly
service.
b. For a tabernacle was prepared: The tabernacle
was a tent 45 feet (15 meters) long, 15 feet (5 meters) wide, and 15 feet (5
meters) high, divided into two rooms. The larger room (the first part) was a 15 feet (5 meter) by 30 feet (10 meter)
room called the "holy place." Behind the second veil was a smaller room 15 feet (5 meter) by 15 feet (5 meter), and
this room was called the Holy of Holiest.
c. The lampstand: This setting for the lamps of the tabernacle
had a middle stem and six branches stood in the first part. It was of an unspecified size, made of pure gold and provided
the only light for the tabernacle (Exodus 25:31-40).
d. The table: This sat in the first part and was made of acacia wood covered with gold, 3 feet (1 meter)
long, 1½ feet (½ meter) wide, and 2 feet 3 inches (.68 meter) high. It held
twelve loaves of showbread, each representing God's fellowship with the
twelve tribes of Israel (Exodus 25:23-30).
e. The sanctuary: This refers to the first part, known as the "holy place." A veil (a thick curtain) separated the first part from the Holy
of Holiest, (Exodus 26:31-33).
f. The golden altar of
incense: This was made of
acacia wood covered with gold, 1½ feet (½ meter) square, and 3 feet (1 meter)
high. It stood at the veil before the "holy of holies" and was used
to burn incense (Exodus 30:1-8).
g. The ark of the covenant: This stood inside the Holy of Holiest and was a chest made of acacia wood covered with
gold, 3¾ feet (1.15 meters) long, 2¼ feet (.68 meter) wide, and 2¼ feet (.68
meter) high, with rings for polls along its side to carry it without touching
the ark itself (Exodus 25:10-22).
*Inside the ark
were the golden pot that had the manna (Exodus
16:33), Aaron's rod that budded (Numbers 17:6-11), and the tablets of the covenant
(Exodus 25:16).
· The manna
reminded Israel of God's provision and their ungratefulness
· Aaron's
rod reminded Israel of their rebellion against God's authority
· The tablets
of the covenant reminded Israel of their failure to keep the Ten
Commandments and the rest of the law
h. The mercy seat: This was the ornate "lid" for the
ark of the covenant, made with the designs of cherubim upon it. The blood of sacrifice
was sprinkled upon it for the forgiveness of Israel's sin on the Day of
Atonement (Exodus 25:17-22).
j. As God looked down
into the ark, He saw the symbols of Israel's sin, rebellion, and failure. But
when the blood of sacrifice was applied to the mercy seat, God saw that blood
covering over the sin of Israel, and He looked at the blood instead of the sin
of Israel.
2. (6-7) Priestly
service in the tabernacle under the Old Covenant.
a. The priests always went into the first part of
the tabernacle, performing the services: The priests, as appointed, went daily into the holy place
to perform priestly functions such as tending the lampstand and replacing the
showbread.
b. But into the second part the high priest went
alone once a year: The "holy of holies"
was entered only once a year by the high priest alone, on the Day of Atonement.
c. The high priest went alone once a year, not
without blood: His entrance into the second part was not for fellowship, but only for atonement. The atoning blood was first for his own sins and then for the sins of his people.
*Access into the Holiest of All was thus severely
restricted. Even when someone could enter, it wasn't for real fellowship with
God.
*The ancient Jewish Rabbis wrote of how the high priest did
not prolong his prayer in the Holy of Holies on the Day of Atonement, because
it might make the people think he had been killed. When he came out he threw a
party for all his friends, because he had emerged safely from the presence of
God.
d. The people's sins committed in ignorance: Sins of ignorance
were the specific aim of the Day of Atonement. It was assumed that known
sin would be taken care of through the regular sin offerings and the daily
sacrifices.
*In this respect, Jesus' work is far greater than the work
done on the Day of Atonement. Jesus' work on the cross is sufficient to atone
for both the sins we do in ignorance and sins that we know.
3. (8-10) The Holy
Spirit gives understanding regarding the priestly service under the Old
Covenant.
a. The way into the Holiest of All was not yet
made manifest while the first tabernacle was still standing: The old had to pass away before God's new way
could be revealed.
b. It was symbolic for the present time: Symbolic is
the ancient Greek word parabole. The tabernacle itself and all that the
Old Covenant represented were suggestive of deeper truths, parables of
the New Covenant.
c. Cannot make him who performed the service
perfect in regard to the conscience: The priestly service under the Old Covenant could not make the
priests offering those sacrifices perfect and clean in regard to the conscience.
* If the cleansing is incomplete for the priest, how much
more for the person the priest worked on behalf of!
d. Fleshly ordinances imposed until the time of
reformation: The weakness of the
priestly service under the Old Covenant was its inability to address the need
for inner transformation in man. Therefore it was only imposed until the time of reformation.
B. Features of the New Covenant described.
1. (11) The superior
sanctuary of the New Covenant.
But Christ came as High
Priest of the good things to come, with the greater and more perfect tabernacle
not made with hands, that is, not of this creation.
a. The greater and more perfect tabernacle not
made with hands: Jesus, as our High
Priest, ministers in a superior sanctuary - the very throne room of God. This
is obviously a place greater than anything human hands could make.
2. (12-15) The superior
sacrifice of the New Covenant.
a. The blood of goats and calves: Animal sacrifice was sufficient for a
temporary covering of sin, but only a perfect sacrifice could obtain eternal redemption.
* Jesus' sacrifice was superior in that it was perfect,
voluntary, rational, and motivated by love.
b. For if the blood of bulls and goats . . .
sanctifies for the purifying of the flesh, how much more shall the blood of
Christ: If these imperfect
sacrifices were received as sufficient by Israel, then they should much more
regard the ultimate sufficiency of the perfect sacrifice.
*The ashes of a heifer refer to the remains of a
burnt offering that was preserved. The ashes were sprinkled in the laver of
washing to provide water suitable for ceremonial cleansing (Numbers 19:1-10).
*This was a shadow, fulfilled and done away with when Jesus
offered a perfect cleansing. Therefore there is no value in "holy
water" used by the Roman Catholic Church.
*Reportedly, there is a search for a "red heifer"
that can be sacrificed, and its ashes used as part of a restoration of priestly
functions for a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem.
c. How much more shall the blood of Christ . . .
cleanse your conscience from dead works to serve the living God? The sacrifice of Jesus is sufficient to even
restore our damaged conscience.
*Our conscience is a wonderful tool from God. But it
isn't perfect. Our conscience can be seared (1 Timothy 4:2). Our
conscience can be defiled (Titus 1:15). Our conscience can be evil
(Hebrews 10:22).
d. Cleanse your conscience from dead works: The idea behind dead works is probably of sin in general, in the sense of "works that
bring death." But it must also speak to the vain continuation of Old
Covenant sacrifice, which is certainly a dead work -
and the very type of thing these discouraged Jewish Christians were tempted to
go back to. “not
by works less any man should boast”
e. To serve the living God: The believer is cleansed, conscience and all,
not to live unto himself but to serve the living God. The ancient Greek word translated serve here is latreuo, which speaks of religious or ceremonial,
priestly service.
*"And, dear friends, do keep in mind that you are
henceforth to 'serve the living God.' You that are acquainted with the Greek
will find that the kind of service here mentioned is not that which the slave
or servant renders to his master, but a worshipful service such as priests
render unto God. We that have been purged by Christ are to render to God the
worship of a royal priesthood. It is ours to present prayers, thanksgivings,
and sacrifice; it is ours to offer the incense of intercession; it is ours to
light the lamp of testimony and furnish the table of shewbread."
(Spurgeon)
f. He is the Mediator of the new covenant, by
means of death: Jesus' work as a
Mediator is fundamentally accomplished at His death. His heavenly work of
mediation looks back to that perfect sacrifice.
g. For the redemption of the transgressions under
the first covenant: Jesus' payment on the
cross accomplished redemption for those under the first covenant. Every sin offering made in faith under the Law
was an IOU cashed in at the cross.
3. (16-22) The necessity
of Jesus' death.
a. For a testament is in force after men are dead: A testament
(in the sense of a "last will and testament") only takes effect when
the person who made the testament dies. Therefore Jesus had to die for the
testament - the covenant - to take effect.
*"If there be a question about whether a man is alive
or not, you cannot administer to his estate, but when you have certain evidence
that the testator has died then the will stands. So is it with the blessed
gospel: if Jesus did not die, then the gospel is null and void."
(Spurgeon)
b. Therefore not even the first covenant was
dedicated without blood:
Clearly, death was necessary to the Old Covenant. Virtually every part of the
sacrificial system under the Law of Moses was touched by blood in some way or another.
c. Without shedding of blood there is no
remission: This is a foundational
principle of God's dealings with men. Modern people think that sin is remitted
(forgiven) by time, by our good works, by our decent lives,
or by simply death. But there is no forgiveness without the
shedding of blood, and there is no perfect forgiveness without a perfect
sacrifice.
*The shedding of Jesus' blood is God's answer to
man's problem of sin. In his sermon The Blood-Shedding, Spurgeon began
by presenting three fools. The first is a soldier wounded on the field of
battle. The medic comes to the soldier, and immediately the solider wants to
know everything about the rifle and the soldier that shot him. The second fool
is a ship captain, whose ship is about to go under in a terrible storm. The
captain is not at the wheel of the ship, trying to guide it through the
crashing waves; he is in his room studying charts, trying to determine where
the storm came from. The third fool is a man who is sick and dying with sin,
about to go under the waves of God's justice, yet is deeply troubled about the origin
of evil. We should look to the solution more than to the problem.
4. (23-28) The perfect
sanctuary receives a perfect sacrifice.
a. It was necessary that the copies of the things
in the heavens should be purified with these: It was acceptable for the copies of the things in the heavens in the earthly sanctuary to be
"purified" with imperfect sacrifices. But the heavenly things themselves could only be purified
with a perfect offering.
b. For Christ has not entered the holy places
made with hands . . . but into heaven itself: Jesus' sacrifice was made on earth, but it is the basis for His
continuing work as our mediator and High Priest in heaven. The writer to the
Hebrews proclaims it: now to appear in the
presence of God for us.
It's not hard to believe that Jesus does appear in the presence of God. But to believe that He appears there for us is glorious!
c. Not that He should offer Himself often: Jesus' ministry for us continues in heaven, but not in the sense of continuing to
atone for our sin. His ministry continues for us in intercession and
defending us against the accuser of God's people (Revelation 12:10). But it
does not continue in the sense that He should offer Himself often. His sacrifice was once-for-all, and perfectly
satisfied God's holy justice.
*This passage and principle is a direct rebuke to the Roman
Catholic practice and theology of the mass. In the mass, the
Roman Catholic Church desires to repeat - not remember, but repeat
- the atoning sacrifice of Jesus innumerable times. This is absolutely
indefensible Scripturally, and denies the finished work of Jesus Christ
on the cross. The Scriptures make it plain: not that He should
offer Himself often.
d. He then would have had to suffer often since
the foundation of the world:
If the sacrifice of Jesus were not perfect, then it would have to be continual
and constant - even since
the foundation of the world.
Imperfect sacrifices must be repeated continually, but a perfect sacrifice can
be made once for all time, and genuinely put away sin
(not just cover sin, as with sacrifice under the Old Covenant). The
message is clear: He has appeared to put
away sin by the sacrifice of Himself.
*This principle of sacrifice explains why the suffering of
hell must be eternal for those who reject the atoning work of Jesus.
They are in hell to pay the penalty of their sin, but as imperfect beings they
are unable to make a perfect payment. If the payment is not perfect, then it
has to be continual and constant - indeed, for all eternity. A
soul could be released from hell the moment its debt of sin was completely paid
- which is another way of saying never.
e. And as it is appointed for men to die once,
but after this the judgment, so Christ was offered once to bear the sins of
many: Just as certainly as
we die once and then face judgment,
so Jesus only had to die once (not repeatedly, not continually) to bear our sins.
*It is not the intention of the writer to the Hebrews to
discuss the issue of reincarnation. That is a side issue; he simply brings up
the obvious point, it is appointed for men to die once, but after this the
judgment. Just as that is obvious, so it is plain that Christ was
offered once to bear the sins of many. For the writer to the Hebrews, the
truth that it is appointed for men to die once, but after this the judgment
is an indisputable principle.
ii. "A man dies once, and after that everything is
fixed and settled, and he answers for his doings at the judgment. One life, one
death - then everything is weighed, and the result declared: 'after this the
judgment.' So Christ comes, and dies once; and after this, for him also the
result of what he has done, namely, the salvation of those who look for him. He
dies once, and then reaps the fixed result, according to the analogy of the
human race, of which he became a member and representative." (Spurgeon)
iii. Though it was not really the point of the writer to
the Hebrews to discuss reincarnation, he certainly and completely denies
it here. We do not die and live and die and live, facing an eternal reckoning
some number of lives down the road. This life is it, and then we face judgment.
This means that there are no second chances beyond the grave. Now
is the time to choose for Jesus Christ, because when we die we simply
face the judgment.
iv. It is important to note that the principle of it is
appointed for men to die once is not an absolute principle. There
are some unique, remarkable exceptions. Enoch (Genesis 5:24) and Elijah (2
Kings 2:11) never died once. Several people in the Bible were raised
from the dead (1 Kings 17:22, 2 Kings 13:20-21, Matthew 9:25, John 11:43-44,
Acts 20:9-11), and therefore died twice. Those taken in the rapture (1
Thessalonians 4:17) will never die once. Yet these remarkable, unique
exceptions do not deny the principle of it is appointed for men to die once;
they are exceptions that prove the rule.
f. He will appear a second time, apart from sin,
for salvation: The focus of Jesus'
first coming was to deal with the sin problem through His atoning sacrifice.
But now, having dealt with the sin problem perfectly, He comes again apart from sin - for the salvation
(in the sense of rescue) of His people.
*To
those who eagerly wait for Him: It is assumed
that all believers will eagerly wait for Him. It's a sad case that this
assumption doesn't always play out as true.
ii. "It ought to be a daily disappointment when our
Lord does not come; instead of being, as I fear it is, a kind of foregone
conclusion that he will not come just yet." (Spurgeon)
MARANATHA! MARANATHA!
No comments:
Post a Comment